mvvemimm = +£r7ད
53
to esonerit ent mert ault a de ebam orow ɑnoitsinsesïqst sendt
atom tat d#1 berabпa7 dołów moltibnon a ni oraw ynolod aft
sidxe end galbiyong to yətlidiɛɛoq ent nistretne of eiɗtaset
at it sennatumuorio saskt ni .Jnsaeng de sus vant marij,J800
and Tablan0097 hlnow #tatë tu visteros2 art tant eldadorquat.
(VIUL mi nevin) moteloeb avolvang aid sangver bna,noltasup
war emoa saeImr (800£ „Tedotoŭ ni bateaqer ntara bre‚80er
ent dily oa ob of mid brommode" I hiroo TON
neatus bar esauso
.em stoteď stab
etsh tart neewted dadd bonelle Jon at JI
.&
ert at onsetont Istonda ns need asɗ eteɗt Jnsesıq end has
rodnet wen vino ant tent verday I bns,aðquod end to drow
ent eltdwnesi .eat soltavt .TX to sutraqeb ont nt atatenos
Istananit at of gatwo beaasront nad teoo abrezat es yflvoittib
Brizo Os Brow tant vilad~gy sa blod ead TuonoH oY .notare¬qab
mort dant bejaqloltes ad vidanosser dänim di betmloggs ezbut
braseront yď bebivong eď binow visina ald to abridt-owd of tiad
on tiaeym evari I bnɛ) oa ed of etsit gniddimEA two to eest
bririt-ano nado asel (noktrogong snt equag of disiriw yď ogba(wond
-nos eft nońw,jen er blow yola) ent of taco fetot ant to
.. nottsbormonas,îtes2 ●temibrodu? to easemont Ialtnempe8-
.noiðarsbłanoo otat naxað əra
.W to noltasup end of gatırater stoteä
Wise's departure or to possible alternative methods of meeting
the difficulties set out by Your Honour, I will allude to two
separate issues which arise out of this question. The first
concerns the fact (which Your Honour has mentioned) that so
long as there are only two Judges, the Appeal Court consists
only of two, and the Chief Justice has a preponderant voice. I
concur that this is not a satisfactory position, either for
Appellants or for Your Honour, and it constitutes I think by
itself a strong argument - but not a new one - for the appoint-
wment of a Third Judge. In Colonies with which I have been con-
-nected the Chief Justices and Pulsne Judges of contiguous
administrations form an Appeal Court. I would suggest on this
analogy for your consideration the possibility of arranging for
an Appeal Court composed of the Judges of Hongkong and Shanghai.
The second point is that Your Honour complains that you have no
qualified Judge with whom to consult in important cases. Your
Honour, however, excludes Mr.-Justice Wise on the grounds that
he has his own Court to attend to and it is difficult to
arrange consultations at suitable times. The same arguments
Would appear to apply to a Third Judge if it be admitted that
the work is so heavy as to fully employ him.
5.
The departure of Mr. Justice Wise on leave
will no doubt be a serious loss to the Bench. Your Honour has expressed
No comments yet.
Private notes are available after approval.